Part One:
Regarding Net Neutrality, Marguerite Reardon of the Cnet's article regarding net neutrality, " Net neutrality repeal means your internet may never be the same" Offers insight on net neutrality and how it will effect Americans. Reardon uses several paragraphs to separate her ideas and organize the different resources regarding net neutrality. The author wants to inform America about what the appeal of net neutrality could mean for America. This article appeals to America because it is thoughtful, supplies facts, and attempts for them to form their own opinions about the topic. In the beginning of Reardon's article, she explains the FCC's reasoning for wanting to repeal net neutrality, she states, "FCC Chairman Ajit Pai wants the US government to stop "micromanaging the internet." On Tuesday he introduced a proposal to repeal the controversial 2015 net neutrality rules that prevented broadband companies from blocking or slowing down access to websites or services.... Pai has called the Obama-era rules "heavy-handed" and "a mistake," and he argues that they've deterred innovation and depressed investment in building and expanding broadband networks. To set things right, he says, he's taking the FCC back a "light touch" approach to regulation. " by providing facts and sources of information creates a quick sense or reliability and credibility with Reardon. She then goes on to remind readers what net neutrality is exactly, "Net neutrality is the principle that all traffic on the internet should be treated equally, regardless of whether you're checking Facebook, posting pictures to Instagram or streaming movies from Netflix or Amazon. It also means that companies like AT&T, which is trying to buy Time Warner, or Comcast, which owns NBC Universal, can't favor their own content over a competitor's content. " this long-winded, modernized explanation leaves no room for questions as it comfortably flows through generations of understanding. One thing she notes that has been stripped is broadband being known as a utility ,"Under the 2015 rules, the FCC reclassified broadband as a utility, which gave it the authority to regulate broadband infrastructure much as it did the old telephone network. The proposal would strip away that classification. " showing how deep the repeal flows. Towards the end of the article, Reardon starts showing opposing views to the repeal of net neutrality, ""Internet rights are civil rights," said Jay Stanley, an ACLU senior policy analyst. "Gutting net neutrality will have a devastating effect on free speech online. Without it, gateway corporations like Comcast, Verizon and AT&T will have too much power to mess with the free flow of information."" by providing the readers with a source outside of the government, it creates enough familiarity and comfort to make sure the reader will trust her more. Throughout the entirety of her article, Reardon remains clear and concise on her viewpoints as well as others, providing the reader with multiple and diverse sources.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
ArchivesCategories |